Flickr user "cdedbdme
Beaufort County Sheriff P.J. Tanner: Let's not after 2 a.m.
In response to a number of late-night shootings, Beaufort County Sheriff P.J. Tanner is advocating a 2 a.m. closing time for many bars.
Namely any bar in unincorporated parts of the county with an alcohol license would have to close by 2.
It's worth noting that bars or restauranty that do not serve liquor (and therefore do not have a liquor license) would not be affected.
Not yet discussed elsewhere are the impacts such a ban might have: would it reduce crime or push more drunken patrons onto the roads or simply to drink elsewhere?
I haven't been able to find much research on the matter, however Greg Huang offers some insight on the national trend and reactions.
Cities nationwide (and even across South Carolina have been implementing similar 2 a.m. closing times.
- When is early enough? Some cities, like Boston, are looking to further restrict opening times, pulling a 2 a.m. hour even earlier in hopes of restricting violence.
- Money? Earlier closing times mean less dollars.
- Flexibility? Huang writes, "Seattle has petitioned the Washington State Liquor Control Board for flexibility in its statewide 2 a.m. closing time. The problem of a citywide 2 a.m. closure, according to officials, is that all bar patrons are pushed out onto the streets at once. Giving Seattle more flexibility would allow the city to stagger the times at which areas close down their bars so police forces can focus on specific areas."
It seems likely that a 2 a.m. closing time would help restrict drinking related issues in the county, but county leaders should consider the impacts and local environment before introducing new blanket rules.
Port Royal previously passed an ordinance requiring businesses that serve alcohol to close by 2 a.m.